War on Drugs: Should Burma be decertified?
Less than a month from
now, Air Force One will be landing in Naypyitaw, carrying the leader of the
world’s still most powerful country. One of the prepared reports from his host
country is expected to be the government’s present drive against drug
production and trafficking.
This is important, because
continued decertification in March 2015 mean continued American opposition to
loans from multilateral development banks.
Of course, the penalty can still be waived on “national security” grounds,
although it is hard to say if Washington will consider Burma’s strictly neutral foreign policy stance from a
positive or negative viewpoint.
During the last two months,
Punako and Nampong, two of the most notorious People’s Militia Force (PMF)
strongholds have been raided. A consignment of more than 600 blocks of heroin
was also seized in Monghsat. In all the three cases, some little known suspects
have been detained but all prominent chiefs of the said PMFs (set up by the
Burma Army) have been left untouched.
As reported in Bouncing Back:
Relapse in the Golden Triangle by Transnational Institute (TNI) last June, quoting
Jean-Luc Lemahieu, former representative of United Nations Office on Drugs and
Crimes (UNODC) “there are no angels in this part of the world, but there are no
full devils either”.
The report nevertheless points
out several design flaws in the government’s 15 (now 20) year master plan to
eradicate drugs which was adopted in 1999. “Government officials say that this
target (2014) was fixed without much consultation, and are at a loss how to
implement it,” it says. “It will never work,” a senior military officer
commented, “but carry it out anyway.” As predicted by him, the plan fell far
short of achieving its goal and was retargeted to 2019. To date, it is not
quite clear either how the government is planning to go about the next 5 years.
One of the problems is the
strategy of the military that has created the PMFs to counter the rebels. The
Ta Moe Nye PMF in northern Shan State is a case in point:
The Ta Moe Nye Militia in
Kutkai Township was formed in the 1960s and supported the government in
fighting the CPB (Communist Party of Burma). Its leaders established a close
working relationship with the subsequent SPDC chairman Senior General Than Shwe
when he was serving as a Tatmadaw officer in northern Shan State, supplying
guides and large numbers of mules and horses of army operations. “We never paid
them for it, but there was an understanding that they would get something in
return”, says a retired army officer who was on active duty in the region at
the time. “These militias were involved in opium and heroin production and they
sent convoys to Lashio. We let them through, and we knew they were transporting
drugs.”
The PMFs, it explains, “are
intended to act as buffer between the Tatmadaw and armed ethnic opposition
groups, and to deny the latter access to territory, resources and population.
Militias are directly under Tatmadaw control and are allowed to do business and
to tax the local population and trade passing through their checkpoints. Many
of them have become heavily involved in the drug trade, especially in recent
years.”
Successive military
government’s focus, it concludes, is on managing the problem as opposed to
attempting to resolve it.
The results are not surprising:
·
Kokang (in 2002) and Wa (in 2005) successfully
banned opium production “mainly because of pressure from the Chinese,”
according to a representative of Mongla group. Following the bans, opium
cultivation‐and
outside investment‐relocated
mainly to southern Shan State
·
Crop substitution programs, which involved land
grabbing for agricultural investment especially by Chinese companies, further
marginalized the poppy growing communities who were forced to depend all the
more on poppy cultivation in order to survive
·
Continuing conflict has also created ‘vacuums’
where foreign financiers have taken advantage of. “It is difficult to get rid
of the drug trade, because of the strong financial support from (outside
sources),” according to a former member of a ceasefire group
·
The involvement of Tatmadaw units and commanders
in the drug trade has also been documented
One problem that needs
immediate resolution, the report says, is the participation of civil society in
discussions on drug policy. This has prompted a CSO member to point out that
Burma’s drug issue “is all about us without us.” Indeed, since the drug problem
affects everybody, it was time all stakeholders came together to find a
solution, instead of wasting time looking for a culprit.
Until then, the United States
should continue encouraging all of the stakeholders to work together instead of
engaging in a debate whether or not to continue decertifying the country.
Tags: Editorial