SNDP demands release of detainees amidst Shan and Ta’ang clashes
Twenty-three villagers are allegedly
missing after over a week of clashes between the Palaung State Liberation
Front/Ta’ang National Liberation Army (PSLF/TNLA) and the Restoration Council of
Shan State/Shan State Army-South (RCSS/SSA-S) in northern Shan State, according
to local political representatives.
PSLF/TNLA armed forces (left) and RCSS/SSA-S armed forces (right) |
In a public statement released yesterday by
the Shan Nationalities Democratic Party (SNDP) in Nam Kham Township, it was
reported that the PSLF/TNLA had detained the missing civilians since the end of
November—all of whom are men between the ages of 18 and 57, and whose
whereabouts remain unknown.
The PSLF/TNLA’s News and Information Office
denied arresting civilians or committing any act of torture during the conflict
period.
The SNDP also implored the ethnic armed
groups to stop fighting, after a series of clashes began on November 27 and
continued into early December.
“As it is the time of peace building and
citizen security, the RCSS/SSA-S and PSLF/TNLA [are requested] to stop the
fighting and cease all hostilities immediately,” the statement said.
Both groups have alleged that they were
“ambushed” by the other, in statements published by RCSS/SSA-S on the Tai
Freedom website and by PSLF/TNLA on social media.
Battles occurred because RCSS/SSA-S entered
PSLF/TNLA territory “without permission,” the latter alleged on December
6—citing Kyaukme, Namhsan, Manton and Nam Kham Townships as the areas where the
TNLA is active. Five days earlier, on December 1, Tai Freedom reported that the
RCSS/SSA-S soldiers were passing through the contested area in the Shweli River
valley after returning from a workshop on the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement
(NCA) held in the group’s base on the Thai-Burma border.
On December 3, Col. Sai Hla, spokesperson
for the RCSS/SSA-S, told SHAN that his group has also been active in the Nam
Kham area since 2005. “We were
just going back to our territory,” he said.
Tension between the groups has been linked
to the controversial NCA: the RCSS/SSA-S was one of the agreement’s eight signatories;
the PSLF/TNLA was one of three groups disqualified by the government from
signing it.
Since the NCA signing, the PSLF/TNLA
described the RCSS/SSA-S as now “allied” with the Burma Army and alleged that
three Burma Army battalions “protected” the RCSS/SSA-S as they shelled the
PSLF/TNLA in recent clashes at the end of November. The RCSS/SSA-S denied these
claims.
“The conflict between RCSS and TNLA is just
a conflict between armed groups. It is not a conflict between Ta’ang people and
Shan people,” the PSLF/TNLA wrote yesterday.
In central Shan State, 10,000
people—including Shan, Ta’ang, Lahu and Lisu villagers—remain displaced by
fighting between the Burma Army and the Shan State Progress Party/Shan State
Army-North (SSPP/SSA-N), another group which opted out of signing the NCA,
citing a lack of inclusivity.
Continued peace talks based on the NCA’s
framework are scheduled to continue later this month.
By Shan Herald Agency for News (S.H.A.N) Staff
Tags: Human Rights, News, War