Tatmadaw's offensives might derail peace process and disrupt elections
The quasi civilian regime of Thein Sein might have wanted it to look like
isolated, accidental clashes between the Shan State Progress Party/Shan State
Army (SSPP/SSA) and the Tatmadaw or Burma Army, but as the battles raged on
employing hundreds of troops, commanded by Lt-General Yar Pyae from Tatmadaw's
Defense Chief of Staff (Army), it becomes clear that it is a systematically
planned, executed actions and more than a neglectable, isolated armed
engagement.
The Tatmadaw offensive that has started on the 6 October, which is still ongoing, begs the question if it would derail the nationwide ceasefire agreement (NCA) and also disrupt the elections in parts of the Shan state.
As the Tatmadaw reinforced it's troops and widened the armed confrontation with the SSPP/SSA, the latter has officially written protest letter to the regime's organ, Union Peace-making Working Committee (UPWC), questioning whether it has abandoned the peace process altogether and has opted for an all-out war instead of peaceful negotiation and political settlement.
On 21 October, SSPP/SSA has
written a five point letter to Sai Mauk Kham, Chairman of the Working Committee
for the Building of Peace in the Union, with cc to Lt. Gen. Soe Win, Dy.
Chairman, Working Committee for the Building of Peace in the Union; U Aung Min, Dy. Chairman, Working Committee for the Building of
Peace in the Union; U Thein Zaw, Dy. Chairman, Working Committee for the
Building of Peace in the Union; and U Khin Maung Soe, Member, Working Committee
for the Building of Peace in the Union.
Working Committee for the
Building of Peace in the Union that the SSPP/SSA mentioned is officially known
as UPWC.
The letter, with the subject titled
“Request for coordination on the Burma Army’s Military Operations in the
SSPP/SSA area near the Headquarters” stated that the SSPP/SSA has out of good
will, on 15/10/2015 generously withdrew from the strategic place of Ta Sarm Poo
Jetty at 17:00 hours, according to the Tatmadaw's request. An area which it had
controlled for over decades.
Furthermore, in an answer to the
Tatmadaw's accusation that the attack with small arms on the Burma Army
garrison in Vieng Kao near Mong Nawng were not ordered by the SSPP/SSA
headquarters and it was in no way
involved in this incident.
In addition, as the Burma Army
has been holding military operations around the Ta Sarm Poo jetty and areas
very close to Wan Hai, the SSPP/SSA headquarters; and the military operations
near the SSPP/SSA headquarters are being directed and personally commanded by
Lt. Gen. Yar Pyae of the Defense Chief of Staff (Army); and thus, the SSPP/SSA
presumed that it is trying to solve political problems by military might, which
instead should be resolved through peaceful negotiations.
The final paragraph that begs
the question, if the Tatmadaw is on war path writes: “Therefore, to enable to
solve political problems by political and peaceful means we humbly request the
immediate halting of the military operations near the SSPP/SSA headquarters. In
the case that if you (the Tatmadaw) prefer to use military force to solve
political problems you can also inform that you have chosen so.”
The bomb explosion in Mong Hsu, which killed one and wounded three others was condemned by the SSPP/SSA through a statement released on 21 October.
The SSPP released three point
statement stated it's regret of the four wounded civilians - where an elderly
woman of 72 years died later, due to the caused injury.
The statement reasoned that a
group of mean people might have tried to disrupt the elections, scheduled for 8
November, and condemned the group for its action against innocent civilians.
The Shan Nationalities Democratic Party (SNDP) has meanwhile asked the Union Election Commission (UEC) to postpone the election in Mong Hsu, Khesi and Tangyan Townships, where fighting are raging, while the Shan Nationalities League for Democracy (SNLD) has urged to keep on with the election schedule as it is, for fear that there won't be representatives in the parliament for the said areas and also not sure when the by-election could take place, if postponed.
On 19 October, SNDP, in a letter
addressed to Chairman of the UEC said as Mong Hsu, Khesi and Tangyang Townships are fleeing to various
places, due to the battles, the people are said to have requested that the
elections be postponed until peace is restored at an appropriate time.
The letter stressed “Because of
this, SNDP according to the agreement of its committee petitioned the UEC
to tackle (the problem) as it sees
appropriate.”
On 26 October, SNLD Chairman
Hkun Htun Oo, on the 27th founding anniversary day of the party,
where the party's candidates were introduced,
said: “The other party (SNDP) asked the elections in Khesi, Tangyan and
Mong Hsu to be postponed, which it thought will lose, but when we practically
looked at it, there is only in Khesi that battles are occurring, not at other
places.”
He said that only if all ethnic
armed groups could sign the peace treaty, a system of federal union could be
established.
SNLD spokesman Sai Leik also
explained that if the election is postponed in the said areas, there will be no
representatives in the parliament for the people in these places and won't be
able to air their their opinion on peace related discussions. Besides, the
postponement of said three areas could
tremendously affect the Shan state's peace process.
Sai Leik stressed that it could
create an opportunity for the Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP) and
its alliance parties – meaning: SNDP - for postponing the elections in areas
the military decided not secure, without asking the political parties. The USDP
alliance parties could ask to postpone elections in places they are weak and
cannot win the elections.
However, the UEC, on 27 October
issued an announcement signed by Chairman U Tin Aye, that in Mong Hsu, Khesi,
Tangyan and Hopang Townships elections would not be held, due to the impossible
situation to conduct free and fair elections.
According to it, the whole Townships of Mong Hsu and Khesi; 8 village tracts in
Tangyan Township; 37 village tracts and 5 quarters in Hopang Township will not
be able to vote in the elections.
The polling body cited Article
10(f) of the Union Election Commission Law, which grants the UEC the authority
to cancel or postpone elections in constituencies where either a natural
disaster or regional instability inhibits election officials’ ability to hold
of free and fair elections.
Earlier, the UEC said it would
cancel voting in villages in conflict-hit ethnic areas of the country owing to
security concerns, an additional threat to an inclusive election. The UEC said
elections could not be held in more than 400 village areas, mostly in Kachin,
Shan and Karen state.
Meanwhile, the US and UN have
urged and called on the military to deescalate the tension and exercise
restraint regarding the armed conflict with the non-signatory ethnic armed
organizations (EAOs) and that it should not pressure
but look at them as partners essential to achieving a lasting peace.
“We made a point
that it's important the government and military show some restraint in those
areas where groups did not sign the ceasefire,” Ben Rhodes, the U.S. deputy
national security adviser, told reporters in Yangon on 20 October.
Echoing the same
line of argument, Vijay Nambiar, an adviser on Myanmar to the Secretary General
of the United Nations, Ban Ki-moon, told Reuters “There's a danger that if that
escalates, that can be interpreted as putting pressure.”
Recently, the military has
heightened the armed engagement in Kachin and northern Shan states, targeting
the Ta'ang National Liberation Army (TNLA), Myanmar National Democratic Army
(MNDAA), and Kachin Independence Army (KIA).
In Kokang area, where it has
been relatively quite for months, battles have again erupted recently at least
in four places, along the China-Burma border, employing infantry forces and
firing heavy artillery, according to the MNDAA spokesman Tun Myat Lin.
He said: “I think they
(Tatmadaw) hasn't change their grand strategy of total annihilation. It seems
they are trying to solve political problems with military might, like in the
past.”
The Tatmadaw has been conducting
offensives on the SSPP/SSA, which is one of the ethnic armed groups that did
not sign the deal. Reportedly, 37 times of armed engagements between October 6
and 19, have occurred, according to military-run newspaper Myawady. Seven Shan
troopers were said to have been killed, while the SSPP/SSA said that some 30
government soldiers had met their death.
Parallel to these development,
United Wa State Army (UWSA) has invited 11 non-signatory EAOs, Karen National
Defence Organization (KNDO) and Kayan Newland Party (KNLP) to Pang Kham (also
known as Pang Hsang, the Wa capital ) on how to view the elections and how to
handle the peace process with the incoming new regime after the elections, on 1
to 3 November.
According to The Irrawaddy, Zhao
Xiaofu, a UWSA spokesperson said: “The meeting will focus on the views of
ethnic armed groups on the election and how we, ethnic armed groups, should
engage with the new government.”
Meanwhile, S.H.A.N. reported
that the regime, in an attempt to save face and also to put public pressure on
the SSPP/SSA and other non-signatory EAOs, held public support rallies from
October 23-24, in Kengtung, Lashio, Loilem, Tachileik and Taunggyi in support
of its partial-ceasefire, dubbed NCA.
The largest of the pro-NCA
rallies was held at a public recreational facility in Taunggyi, Shan State’s
capital. Four thousand people attended the event.
But some
attendees at the pro-NCA peace events told S.H.A.N. that they came because they
were summoned by their township administration.
“They called
us from the village,” said Sai Khun Aung, 24, a local resident. “Only when we
got here did we know that it was to support the NCA.”
Looking at the
chain of political development, it seems that the regime, in its desperation to
whip the non-signatory EAOs into line, according to its desire of signing the
treaty, has pushed them further aback by applying military pressure.
It is not
clear, if the recent announcement of no election in SSPP/SSA operational and
influence areas, where the SNLD has an edge over SNDP and other parties, to
undercut the former's electoral success and lessen its opportunity to gather
more representative seats in the parliament, make sense in conducting a free
and fair elections. Many already are accusing the USDP-Military regime to be
killing two birds with one bullet. That is, pressuring the SSPP/SSA militarily
to sign the NCA and at the same time, undercutting the SNLD political power
base, which is well known to be backed by the SSPP/SSA.
Furthermore,
the escalation of war in non-signatory EAOs' areas would likely be met with
stiff resistance and could even result in a wider armed conflict, if regional
power and super power would get involved, one way or the other.
UWSA is seen
as China proxy, while the USDP-Military regime is keen to be seeking the US and
West backing to free itself from the Chinese clutch.
Other than
that, this military adventure of the Tatmadaw could derail the regime's much
touted NCA and even disrupt the election nationwide by widening the scope of
no-vote areas, through armed attacks and provocation on a wider scale in ethnic
areas.
But whether the Tatmadaw will
tighten the military screw more in ethnic areas and disrupt the elections or
loosen it to let the elections run its course is a question that only time
could answer.
Tags: Opinion